{"id":17964,"date":"2014-12-03T15:39:25","date_gmt":"2014-12-03T15:39:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lern.org\/?p=2198"},"modified":"2021-08-02T12:21:45","modified_gmt":"2021-08-02T17:21:45","slug":"do-guys-teach-like-girls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/do-guys-teach-like-girls\/","title":{"rendered":"Do guys teach like girls?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"guys\"<\/a>Male faculty grade just like female faculty, giving male students worse grades than their female students, even though the male students learn as much.\u00a0\u00a0 The results of our initial research suggest that male faculty behave just like their male students when the male faculty become learners themselves. For example, the male faculty as learners do 30% less work than female faculty as learners, just like the breakdown for their male and female students.
\nSo do male faculty teach like their female counterparts?\u00a0 The outcome of our first survey suggests kinda, sorta, but male faculty also show some evidence of male gender characteristics in their teaching. Here\u2019s the results of our first survey. Since we are writing for faculty, you may find the survey inconclusive, statistically insufficient and\/or invalid, not really about teaching, a bad survey question, or all of the above. But we found the question important pedagogically, and the survey results sufficiently fascinating to report.
\nGuys versus gals<\/b>
\nThe survey question asked whether a student should choose an answer on an exam that conformed with the textbook, or with the teacher. We compared faculty responses to the question by the sex of the faculty member.\u00a0 Then we did another survey to another set of faculty with the same question, only stating \u201cif you were a student,\u201d to see if the results differed by gender when the faculty member responded as a student rather than a teacher.
\nTextbook versus Teacher<\/b>
\nThe situation was actually a true case. In an economics course on micro loans, the textbook says a micro loan is less than $250, but the teacher says a million dollar dam in an underdeveloped country qualifies as a micro loan.
\nWhen the difference in definitions is pointed out by the student, the teacher reiterates the teacher\u2019s answer and says the question will be on the mid-term exam. We then asked faculty, should the student on the mid-term exam question give the answer according to the textbook or the teacher?
\nWe did not tell faculty that the student was a male. The gender of the student is significant according to the research on gender in the classroom in terms of how male and females respond as learners.\u00a0 We also did not tell faculty the sex of the teacher, which in our view is not important.\u00a0 At the end of this article we will tell you what the male student said he would do.
\nSurvey Results<\/b>
\nOverall, all faculty said the student should respond to the exam question according to the teacher\u2019s answer, regardless of what the textbook says. Some 64% of faculty said Teacher, and 36% said answer according to the Textbook.
\nHow Female Faculty Responded<\/b>
\nFemale faculty sided with the teacher far more than male faculty. Some 71% of female faculty recommended responding according to the Teacher while just 29% said to answer the question according to the Textbook.
\nThe research on gender would predict this and find the female faculty responses totally consistent with how females behave in the classroom.
\nHow Male Faculty Responded
\n<\/b>Male faculty were not only more evenly divided on the correct student response, but three times as many male faculty felt compelled to comment on the survey and explain their answers. Just 57% of the male faculty recommended responding according to the Teacher while 43% of the male faculty said to answer the question according to the Textbook.
\nThe number and strongly felt wording of the comments is also a gender characteristic that the literature would support as a male trait.
\nBoth female and male faculty responding to \u201cif you were a student\u201d favored the Teacher. Combining the responses of female and male faculty, the results were 74% for the Teacher and just 26% for the Textbook.\u00a0 Even with the small survey sample, these results were statistically valid, meaning that if we surveyed lots more faculty, the results would still tilt strongly towards answering according to the Teacher.
\nResponding from the perspective of a faculty member (\u201cShould a student\u2026\u201d), just 58% of faculty favored the Teacher and fully 42% (37% of female faculty and 50% of male faculty) said to respond according to the Textbook.
\nStatistical Validity
\n<\/b>As we mention above, the \u201cif you were a student\u201d for combining the male and female faculty was statistically valid. The worse it could be if we surveyed every faculty member in every institution would be\u00a0 an error range of 17%, making the worst possible scenario 58% for the Teacher and 42% for the Textbook, still a significant difference.
\nCombining the \u201cif you were a student\u201d with \u201cshould a student\u201d (presumably a faculty viewpoint) results, there is an outside chance the results could be 50-50 (no difference) if we surveyed every faculty member on the planet.
\nThere were not enough survey respondents to achieve statistically valid results between male faculty members and female faculty for \u201cif you were a student\u201d and \u201cshould a student\u201d questions.
\nMale Faculty Comments<\/b>
\n<\/b>\u00a0Male faculty comments fell into three general areas.\u00a0 Of more interest is the number of male faculty members making comments (the survey did not request or have an obvious space for comments), and the strongly felt wording of those comments.
\nThe most prevalent kind of\u00a0 comment was about resignation, accepting reality and playing the game. \u201cThis is a life lesson,\u201d said one. \u201cYou have to learn to pick your battles.\u201d \u201cWhen in Rome,\u201d said another, \u201cbow to Caesar.\u201d\u00a0 He began another sentence with the word \u201cUnfortunately,\u2026..\u201d
\nThe second most prevalent comment was that textbooks are often out of date. And the third most prevalent comment was maintaining that either answer could be correct.
\nThe Textbook is Correct<\/b>
\nFrom a literature search on the definition of \u201cmicro-loan,\u201d we could find no definition coming anywhere close to the Teacher\u2019s contention that a million dollar dam would qualify.\u00a0 There were a number of different dollar amounts placed on the limit of a micro-loan, all of them being so far less than a million dollars that there should be no question about the correct answer.
\nWhat the Male Student Said and Did
\n<\/b>So here\u2019s what the male student in our true story said he would do.\u00a0 \u201c I\u2019m \u00a0going to give the correct answer\u2026..regardless of what the teacher says,\u201d he concluded.\u00a0 This is very male characteristic behavior.\u00a0 And of course he chose the answer according to the Textbook.
\nMales are far more geared towards the work place than the schoolroom. Male gender characteristics tend to be those that are valued in the workplace, such as challenging the status quo, creating something new and different, and competition.
\nSummary
\n<\/b>Male faculty clearly grade like female faculty yet demonstrate male gender characteristics as learners.
\nWhile the survey results were hardly conclusive, the intriguing responses from male faculty suggest they do indeed exhibit some gender based male characteristics as teachers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Male faculty grade just like female faculty, giving male students worse grades than their female students, even though the male students learn as much.\u00a0\u00a0 The results of our initial research suggest that male faculty behave just like their male students when the male faculty become learners themselves. For example, the male faculty as learners do<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2199,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17964","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17964","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17964"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17964\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18864,"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17964\/revisions\/18864"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lern.com\/lerntest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}